The Device is the Boring Bit

The Apple Vision Pro is now on sale. People are getting their hands on them, and sharing their opinions. People who haven't got their hands on them are sharing their opinions. There are a lot of opinions flying around.

First thing - sure, I'm interested in the headset, and the device actually getting in 'normal' people's hands (or on their faces) is this week's news; I'm not going to buy one, because it's ridiculously expensive and if I had that sort of money to throw around, I probably wouldn't be driving a car that's approaching either its 18th birthday or its last trip to the scrapyard and has done the equivalent milage of 5 times around the circumference of the earth.


But what I'm really interested in is the Vision platform; the bits in the software that are going to be the same when the next headset device is launched. And once there are a bunch of different ‘Vision’ devices - where they will fit, in the spaces in people's lives.

The Metaverse is an Elephant

One reason the Metaverse is doomed is because of the idea that it will straddle all of the different computing platforms; too many conflicting business interests will make this impossible to execute.

One reason the Metaverse will succeed is because of the idea that when something, sooner or later, straddle all of the computing platforms, it will deliver something incredibly useful.

How might 'Metaverse Identities' work- and what's in it for Meta?

If “moving seamlessly between virtual spaces” is a key feature of the metaverse, how might that actually work with virtual identities on a decentralised platform? (And why would Mark Zuckeberg, who holds a bigger centralised database of virtual identities than anyone, want that to happen?)