Scott's Law of Automation
Automation should help people do tasks - not take them away.
I wrote this for the IPA's website in 2014 about how the word “digital” has been used to mean so many different things to so many different people that its effectively lost all meaning - and that if we’re not careful, “data” could be next.
On a minor obsession with my coffee mugs at home, and the fact that after a long break, I’m back to drinking coffee from the office coffee machine again, and wondering what post-pandemic office life might look like.
Thinking about the way that ‘bots’ on the internet are affecting what the online experience for humans has become.
Do you have a password strategy? You should have a password strategy. Here are some tips for figuring out your own password strategy.
Computers are a useful tool. Computers are powerful. Computers can do incredible things. Computers can let you play fun games. Computers can help you write and record music, or create art, or make films.
Doesn’t mean you have to like them…
its become pretty clear to me that this (#gestures vaguely around#) is "normal" now. No, we haven't gone "back to normal", whatever that might mean (I don't think it really means anything in this context, other than the fantasy of a world without SARS-CoV-2 and all that it entails... which is basically everything that has happened in the last 6 months or so...) But I think we can say that whatever this (#gestures again#) is is "normal" now.
A change from my. usual topics - how I painted a model of an Orky plane thing from Games Workshop.
Some people look at data art as a challenge to do the most original, visually interesting, arresting piece of art that somehow corresponds to a data set. Thats fine… But it’s the line of thinking that gave us all those 3D charts in old versions of Excel and chartjunk galore.
The other way of looking at it can get you to a different place - how do you make 'art' that actually represents the data? I think some of the best data art boils down to a straightforward bar chart, and this is no exception…
What I write here tends to be what I'm thinking about, with a general theme of 'how people adapt to technology'. Right now, our society is undergoing a seismic shift - millions of people are suddenly living and working in a totally different routine, much of which is enabled by the internet and online services - meaning I've got way too many things to be thinking and writing about to actually write any of them down.
So, this is a "for now" post while I try to get my head around what comes next.
“No man is an Island, intire of it selfe; every man is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine; if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine owne were; any mans death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankinde;
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.”
A clear out of all the interesting links, ideas, drafts and news that I've been filing away. New year, New decade, fresh start and all of that...
The "I'm still a bit undecided about my vote direction this coming Thursday" copypasta meme has made my mind up. (I've seen it from a couple of people on Facebook not really linked to each other, so I assume it's done the rounds and we've all seen it now.)
In a recent episode of the “Rule of Three” podcast, Joel Morris (one of the podcast hosts) says, about 4 and a half minutes in;
I was always under the impression that Googlebox was a fiction, that families didn't gather around the TV and watch it anymore [...], and we looked up the BARB figures (about 5 years ago) were that 85% of programmes were watched live, by a family, on a sofa, when they went out. And I thought - god, I thought that was a vintage and antique thing. I am sure that is not true any more, and that must have changed really quickly, and I'm wondering whether the culture of comedy, where the demand is for things to hit straight away, whether people have quite caught up with the fact that people consume everything so differently now."
I'm really interested in changing TV viewing behaviour for all sorts of reasons, so I thought I'd take a look at whether this is true - what has changed in the last 5 years?
Of the dozens - probably hundreds - of playlists I’ve made in the 15 or so years of using ‘players’ like iTunes, one of them has stood out from the others.
Its now about 11 and a half years since I thought it would be a good idea to work in the media industry for a year or so. I didn't quite understand how everything was on the internet for free but somehow companies like Google and Facebook were worth millions of dollars - but knew that it was something to do with advertising, and wanted to understand how that business worked a bit better.
As it turns out, the first thing I learnt which pretty much shaped the next decade of my career was that communications technology might be interesting, but the impact it has on people and their behaviour is far, far more interesting.
Something else I learnt, probably a few years later, was that the world of "digital" that was massively disrupting the advertising industry is only a subset of "marketing". The problem is that "best practice" for digital media/advertising isn't necessarily "best practice" for advertising in general.
A long-winded way of saying that I don’t sit down and watch adverts because I care about advertising.